YouTube: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "YouTube is a video streaming service that was acquired by Alphabet, Inc., back when it was known as Google. Around the time YouTube was acquired, it was getting sued by a lot of big TV companies for a IP infringement. Despite having a policy where content publishers could request takedowns, an internal memo was discovered that said they should not proactively take down pirated content, but only be reactive one content owners requested it's removal, as it would directly...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Around the time YouTube was acquired, it was getting sued by a lot of big TV companies for a IP infringement. Despite having a policy where content publishers could request takedowns, an internal memo was discovered that said they should not proactively take down pirated content, but only be reactive one content owners requested it's removal, as it would directly impact their bottom line at the time. They obviously settled the matter. | Around the time YouTube was acquired, it was getting sued by a lot of big TV companies for a IP infringement. Despite having a policy where content publishers could request takedowns, an internal memo was discovered that said they should not proactively take down pirated content, but only be reactive one content owners requested it's removal, as it would directly impact their bottom line at the time. They obviously settled the matter. | ||
<p></p> | |||
==See also== | |||
* [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLwzeC-e0vv8cBQ-6Mb2XlkeuoFicC-1rw Nik's Favorites on YouTube] | |||
[[Category:2022 Articles]] | |||
Latest revision as of 04:23, 17 December 2022
YouTube is a video streaming service that was acquired by Alphabet, Inc., back when it was known as Google.
Around the time YouTube was acquired, it was getting sued by a lot of big TV companies for a IP infringement. Despite having a policy where content publishers could request takedowns, an internal memo was discovered that said they should not proactively take down pirated content, but only be reactive one content owners requested it's removal, as it would directly impact their bottom line at the time. They obviously settled the matter.