Referendum on Tax Hikes: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
It reminds me of Warren Buffett’s | It reminds me of Warren Buffett’s idea to “end the deficit in five minutes” by disqualifying lawmakers from re-election if the federal deficit exceeds 3% of GDP. Even if originally offered tongue-in-cheek, proposals like these spark creative thinking about how to build stronger checks and balances into fiscal policy. | ||
<embedvideo service="facebook" dimensions="400x600">https://www.facebook.com/659481510/videos/1260617632047977/</embedvideo> | <embedvideo service="facebook" dimensions="400x600">https://www.facebook.com/659481510/videos/1260617632047977/</embedvideo> | ||
Revision as of 2025-08-23T21:36:08
Interesting reel from Mario Zelaya about Pierre Poilievre’s pledge to introduce a **Taxpayer Protection Act** that would require any new tax or tax increase to be approved by a national referendum—not just by politicians. His framing: taxpayers should have a direct say, and any new spending should be offset by cuts elsewhere.
This is actually genius. I wish this was done 25 years ago. #taxhike #pierrepoilievre #conservatives #canada
It reminds me of Warren Buffett’s idea to “end the deficit in five minutes” by disqualifying lawmakers from re-election if the federal deficit exceeds 3% of GDP. Even if originally offered tongue-in-cheek, proposals like these spark creative thinking about how to build stronger checks and balances into fiscal policy.